Tehran, IRNA – After nearly five months of suspension, Vienna talks have resumed on August 4, while not only the effective and permanent lifting of sanctions, but also the closing the IAEA’s technical issues regarding Iran’s nuclear program are prerequisite to reaching final agreement.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has been fulfilling its nuclear commitments under a nuclear agreement (JCPOA) that the US withdrew the agreement in the government of Donald Trump in May 2018 and by reinforcing the unilateral sanctions and setting maximum pressure.
Since April 2021, the Islamic Republic of Iran has been negotiating with other sides in good faith to resume the full implementation of the agreement, but due to the inability of US President Joe Biden administration to make a political decision to return to this agreement and ensure Iran’s enjoyment of the promised economic benefits, return to this agreement is not reached yet.
Meanwhile, the US authorities, who are the cause of this situation, instead of overcoming the problems and making political decisions, in a blame game since the beginning of these negotiations, have taken various scenarios to make Iran guilty; From the tactic of artificial deadlines to the new tactic of claiming that their expectations are low and limited.
But the thing to think about is that the focus of all these scenarios is the fear of the progress of Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, which is carried out in response to the violation of their promise, and without the slightest reference to this breach of promise, the resulting damages and offering compensatory operational solutions.
They are only following the scenario of fear of nuclear developments and the madness of applying pressure and threats.
In the puzzle of propagating fear on Iran’s nuclear program, they have even tried to line up the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director-general Rafael Grossi, with them, as Grossi claimed to reporters on the sidelines of the 10th NPT review conference in New York that the nuclear program Iran is ambitious, broad and technically complex.
Iran’s nuclear program is progressing very quickly, he claimed, saying that the iranian nuclear program was different in 2022 than its plan in 2015.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director-general, without referring to the US violation of the treaty, said that to verify this nuclear program, we need access to progress and immediately acknowledged that it is impossible to affirm the nuclear program of Iran, but it is very comprehensive and necessary.
But the fact is that the The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), unfortunately , seeks double standards in applying the provisions of non – proliferation , not only to exclude the nuclear weapons of the Zionist regime which are being produced with US support and assistance, but rather to undermine the claims of the Israeli terrorist regime and spy services as a basis against Iran’s nuclear program.
The Zionist regime which has already assassinated several Iranian nuclear scientists, had recently threatened to attack nuclear facilities under the auspices of the Agency in the Islamic Republic of Iran, but The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director-general has not even dared to respond and comment.
The obvious fact is that the Islamic Republic of Iran is committed to non – proliferation as well as the constant support of the nuclear weapon , and supports non – discrimination and impartial enforcement of the nuclear weapons system by the The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
Iran has always stressed The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), should perform its duties as a profession free from third – party pressure and especially accusations of espionage.
Therefore, if The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), is now reluctant to reduce its duties on some nuclear installations and its director – general maintains that ” good statements are not enough and transparency , adherence and compliance with the IAEA, ” should be proved before all , and is not under the influence of persuasion and scenarios and the documentation of the world ‘s intelligence services.
Although it is obvious The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is politically dependent on the west and particular power, The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director-general Rafael Grossi should dare to maintain the integrity and credibility of the international institution, not just not all of the claims but also technically and legally binding any claims on the ground.
Source: Islamic Republic News Agency – IRNA
