Tehran: Dr. Larijani, a senior adviser to Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, has issued a stern warning regarding potential attacks by the U.S. or Israel under the guise of Iran's nuclear program. He emphasized that such actions could compel Iran to develop nuclear weapons, despite the leadership's current decree against it. "The Americans are talking nonsense regarding the Iranian nuclear issue," he stated, adding that Iran would not pursue nuclear arms unless provoked by the U.S. According to Dr. Larijani, public pressure could force a shift in policy if America errs in its approach.
According to Islamic Republic News Agency, Dr. Larijani's statements carry significant weight as they are backed by governmental authority and reflect broader national sentiments. The context of these remarks is intensified by the historical backdrop of the U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) during Trump's presidency and Europe's subsequent failure to meet its commitments. This scenario led Iran to abandon extra-safeguards restrictions, resulting in advancements in nuclear knowledge that benefited various sectors within the country. However, these developments were unintended consequences of the U.S.'s initial pressure, which ultimately proved detrimental to American interests.
Despite the tensions, Iran maintains its commitment to peaceful nuclear pursuits as dictated by the Supreme Leader's fatwa against nuclear weapons production. Nevertheless, it is suggested that continued missteps by the U.S. could lead to public demands for the expansion of Iran's nuclear capabilities. This situation underscores the need for the U.S. to reconsider its stance on sanctions and engage in genuine negotiations, which Trump has previously claimed to support.
Engaging in indirect negotiations is portrayed as a strategic move, allowing for a better understanding of mutual demands and concessions. While Trump has often vocalized his expectations, he has yet to clarify what he would offer in return. Indirect talks could shift the discourse from threats to transparency, with Iran asserting that any negotiation must protect its interests for it to consider concessions.
Dr. Larijani also highlighted Iran's historical stance as a peace-loving nation, which has consistently defended itself against aggression rather than initiating conflict. He criticized the contradiction between Trump's peace rhetoric and his aggressive policies. Lifting sanctions could open economic opportunities with American companies, but this requires a shift from pressure tactics to cooperative engagement. Ultimately, the decision rests with U.S. leaders, who must determine the future trajectory of their relationship with Iran.